Similarly, if he must permit something sopra an emergency, he must clarify his reason for that particular caseadmin
Just as per rabbi may not permit that which is forbidden, so must he be careful not onesto forbid that which is permitted. Therefore, if a rabbi must forbid something merely because of verso question of law, because of a custom, or because of special circumstances, he must state his reason so as not sicuro establish an erroneous precedent.
Nevertheless, it is forbidden for a city to split into two congregations primarily because of verso dispute over law or practice
A rabbi should be careful not esatto render an unusual or anomalous decision, unless he carefully explains the reasons for it. Therefore, any uncommon decision that depends on subtle or esoteric reasoning should not be publicized, lest it lead to erroneous conclusions. It is for this reason that there are cases which are permitted only con the case of per scholar, and which may not be taught to the ignorant.
When per rabbi renders per decision mediante per case durante which there are per niente clear precedents, he must strive esatto bring as many proofs as possible…
When a rabbi renders verso decision mediante a question of law, the Torah recognizes it as binding. Therefore, when verso rabbi decides on per case and forbids something, it becomes intrinsically forbidden.
Since the initial decision renders the subject of per case intrinsically forbidden, it cannot be permitted even by per greater sage or by verso majority rule.
An erroneous decision cannot render per case intrinsically forbidden. Therefore, if per second rabbi is able sicuro esibizione that the original decision is refuted by generally accepted authorities or codes, he may reverse the original decision.
Similarly, verso https://datingranking.net/it/wing-review/ decision that is retracted with good reason does not render per case intrinsically forbidden. Therefore, if verso second rabbi is able esatto determine that common practice traditionally opposes the initial ong authorities, he may convince the first rabbi puro retract his decision and permit the case durante question. Individual logic and judgment, however, are not considered sufficient reason for verso rabbi to reverse even his own decision…
Mediante order to prevent controversy, one should not present per case before per rabbi without informing him of any previous decisions associated with that particular case.
One rabbi can overturn the decision of another only if he can prove the initial decision puro be erroneous
Although the Torah demands per insecable degree of uniformity mediante practice, it does recognize geographical differences. Therefore, different communities may follow varying opinions mediante minor questions of Torah law.
However, where there is per niente geographical or similar justification for varied practices, such differences are liable puro be associated with ideological divergences and are forbidden. Within a solo community, the Torah requires verso high degree of uniformity sopra religious practice. In no case should it be made esatto appear that there is more than one Torah.
It is written, “You are children of God your Lord; you must not mutilate yourselves (lo tit-godedu)” (Deut. 14:1). Just as it is forbidden onesto mutilate one’s body, so is it prohibited preciso mutilate the body of Judaism by dividing it into factions. Esatto do so is preciso disaffirm the universal fatherhood of God and the unity of His Torah.
It is therefore forbidden for members of verso solo congregation onesto form factions, each following verso different practice or opinion. It is likewise forbidden for a single rabbinical breviligne preciso issue verso split decision.
However, where verso city has more than one congregation, or more than one rabbinical athletique, the following of each one is counted as a separate community, and each one may follow different practices.